FICHA 18.3 .THIRD BATCH.”AT”. And there should be a card shark in these snap elections if we want to win much money and not to make do with our windfall

🚣🚣🚣.PREPOSITION ….”AT”…..empleamos at” cuando señalamos el  punto exacto ,,,, de tiempo,,,, de lugar,de espacio,,,,, veamos …… at the airport,,,,, at home,,,, at the theater,,,,,at the top right hand corner  (en la parte superior derecha )  Tambien lo usamos para las vacaciones ,,,,,, at Easter,,,at Christmas…… Recordemos finalmente que uno trabaja en un sitio ,,, WORK AT,,,,, pero si se quiere expresar el entorno o espacio ,lugar dentro donde se trabaja se dice ,,,,WORK IN … ..Veamos,,,,, I work at” the airport in the mornings but in the afternoons I work in” the toy store at the airport mall .

Finalmente AT se utiliza para expresar el objetivo de una expresión verbal o ataque físico ,,,,,, por ejemplo….SHOOT AT, LAUGH AT, SHOUT AT,  SMILE AT, ,,,,, recordemos que  ARRIVE AT y no arrive to .



↗️SNAP ELECTIONS…………….elecciones anticipadas ,,,,,, snap’ es 🔹chasquido , el ruido cuando algo se rompe….. Viene a expresar movimiento rápido ,,,,, por eso también es ,,,,,, 🔹una foto,,,,,,,,🔹un bocado,,,,,,,, .tambien significa …..ola de frío ,,,,,↗️COLD SNAP,,,,,,,,,pero OJO que ola de calor se dice ,,,,,↗️HEAT WAVE

↗️STING……. Es 🔹aguijón,,,,,,, 🔹picar ( un insecto ) ……. Pero cuidado que también es ….. 🔹Estafa , timo ,,,,,,, también estafa , se dice con,,,,,,, ↗️SWINDLE ,,,,, ↗️RIP-OFF ,,,,,, ↗️CON ,,,,↗️SCAM ( el inglés no es muy sencillo ) .

↗️CARD SHARK,,,,,, es un 🔹mago de cartas ,fulero.

↗️WINDFALL ,,,,,,,, es 🔹dinero caído del cielo por loteria , herencia etc…..



↗️TALL ORDER…… no es una orden alta sino,,,,,🔹una ardua tarea.

↗️THE TOP BRASS… es un latón de calidad sino,,,,,, 🔹la cúpula ejecutiva o los mandamases o los directivos etc…

➡️➡️La cúpula directiva ha bajado a los infiernos y  ha aceptado la ardua tarea de cerrar las sucursales en el extranjero …… ➡️➡️The top brass has come down to hell and accepted to close down the branches abroad as a tall order ,,,,, es más cómoda para el inglés esta construcción que decir ,,, 🔸accepted the tall order of (esta es una construcción más espanglish)


🚣🚣🚣.POSCAST . BBC 4 thought of the day .


I leave the transcript to follow easily :


Not so long ago I stood on the steps of Cologne Cathedral in Germany and experienced the poignancy of being somewhere that had in recent history endured dreadful human suffering. The city was bombed to bits during the Second World War. It is now well known that the enormous Cathedral only survived Allied bombing because it served as a navigation beacon for pilots. But, when the cathedral switched off its lights earlier this week, it was intended to question a different set of bearings and offer a different moral compass.

Cologne is one of the cities to have seen growing protests against what is called the “Islamisation of the West”. What began as a small demonstration by a couple of hundred from the east German right wing has grown into marches of up to 18,000 people. And the majority of these people can’t be brushed off as wild neo-Nazis, although such people are deeply involved in shaping and leading the protests. Known as Pegida, this movement has provoked counter-demonstrations and serious critical comment by leading political and public figures, including Angela Merkel in her New Year address.

What is challenging about this phenomenon is how irrational some of the comment by protesters has been. According to some, all Muslims are to be seen as a threat to the blonde daughters of civilised Germans. In language that will sound familiar on this side of the Channel, Germany is being swamped by Muslims – despite clear evidence in some of these places that the numbers of Muslims is very low.

Why is it that in such matters perception is so much more powerful than reality? And why is it that the fires of fear are so easy to stoke when people generally begin to feel a bit insecure economically – or that we often feel the need to turn inward and focus our fear or resentment on the ‘outsider’?

This is not to question the power of perception or the need for proper (and informed) debates about immigration and culture – at every level and from political leaders. But, it is to dig beneath the presenting rationalization for such protests and ask if all is what it seems to be – or what we would like it to be. Genuine motivation is not always immediately obvious, especially where fear or discomfort are concerned.

And these aren’t exactly new questions either, are they? Read the Bible and you find ethnic cleansing, dreadful brutality and fear of those who are different. Yet, read the same Bible and you get injunctions to welcome the outsider, give hospitality to the asylum-seeker, feed the hungry, love the enemy as well as the neighbour, and drop the fear. And the message is clear: we have a choice how to behave: be driven by fear and insecurity into suspicion and hatred of the other, or take the risk of dancing to a different tune







This entry was posted in Fichas 4. Cláusula IF, Uncategorized and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s